Research and Facility Cores

Scientific Facility Cores

Integrative Health Sciences (IHS)

Leaders: Marc Schenker, Lars Berglund, Bill Lasley.

This core integrates the disciplines of human population studies (epidemiology), environmental exposure sampling and assessment, animal studies, biomedical/experimental/ clinical investigations and public health practice. The Core’s primary function is to facilitate interactions among all the other cores that comprise the Center for Environmental Health Sciences (CEHS), with an overall goal of translating basic environmental health science into practical tools for the detection, prevention and treatment of disease in clinical and community-based populations. Investigators: This Core brings together epidemiologists, Schenker, Gold, and Lasley, clinical investigators (Berglund), environmental epidemiologists (Hertz-Picciotto) and exposure assessment experts (Bennett). Their multidisciplinary, integrative research includes: respiratory and neurodevelopmental disease, cancer, and environmental effects on oxidative stress and endocrine-mediated disease. Specific human diseases and disorders are a target of much research within this core, reflecting the interaction of population scientists and clinical investigators working closely with basic scientists. Further, this research addresses health hazards from agrochemicals and related xenobiotics, and environmental contaminants, in many cases with particular attention to populations reflecting exposures at urban-agricultural interfaces.

 The specific aims of this Facility Core are to:

Provide information, facilities, staff and clinical expertise in order to conduct human population and clinical studies that will translate basic scientific findings into improved public health outcomes. Specifically:

(1) Identify and develop populations for sampling who have been exposed to neurodevelopmental, respiratory/cardiovascular or endocrinologic toxicants or carcinogens generated in the urban-agricultural interface in the Central Valley. Likewise to develop human populations affected with respiratory/cardiovascular, neurodevelopmental or endocrinologic conditions or cancer to identify environmental etiologic factors that are possibly related to these disorders;

(2) Collect environmental samples or biologic specimens to assess exposures by other Center investigators in an effort to assist with the characterization of toxicity mechanisms, exposures and/or adverse health effects;

(3) Coordinate the Facility Cores and so generate the appropriate data. These data will provide information on exposures, diseases and chemical/molecular profiles of biomarker expressions. Analysis of these data will lead to development of correlations of pollutant exposures or environmental contaminants with specific morbid conditions, and confirm or suggest hypotheses;

(4) Use the IHS data repository to aid formulation of plausible exposure–disease scenarios/hypotheses with the help of the Animal/Cell Models Facility Core or other relevant cores to delineate possible mechanisms by which toxic chemicals alter normal physiology of target organs leading to specific morbidities;

(5) Use IHS Core facilities and clinical expertise, to assist in construction of confirmatory studies. These studies will use clinical or community-based biological samples to conduct molecular epidemiologic studies with a goal of establishing cause-and-effect relationships between exposure and the target disease or disorder. In this way, the IHS Facility Core will be a conduit to clinical studies to validate and evaluate biomarkers of exposure and disease, and to initiate intervention or therapy for environmentally associated conditions;

(6) Serve as liaison for the Community Outreach and Education Core’s efforts to increase public awareness of environmental health factors and appropriate interventions to reduce risk from environmental toxicants.

The Integrated Health Sciences Core plays a central role in the UC Davis NIEHS Center.  This Core acts as the focal point for the translational activities planned by many of the Center’s investigators in the next 5 year period and serves as the primary mechanism by which Center investigators will be able to implement a more disease oriented approach in their work. The IHS Core will provide access that Center investigators will need to test hypotheses originally developed in animal models to obtain defined diseased/exposed and cohort populations to test their theories in humans.   

Analytical Core

Leader - Bruce Hammock

The Analytical Core provides modern analytical capability to Center investigators.  The Analytical Core is located in Everson Hall in the Central Campus and is divided into an instrumental laboratory and an immunochemical–biosensor laboratory. The Core assists Center laboratories with their analytical needs. This includes state of the art mass spectrometry equipment, but also more general analytical equipment for those laboratories lacking such equipment. The goal is to provide facilities and expertise to analyze small molecules largely by mass spectrometry and by immunoassay.  These techniques have and are being applied to human exposure to agricultural chemicals and other xenobiotics as well as pharmacokinetic evaluation and biomarker analysis.  Complementing the Genomics/Proteomics Core, the Analytical Facility Core provides instrumental and intellectual support for metabolomic characterization of biological systems.  Specifically this core provides expertise on chromatographic purification, identification and quantitative analysis of small molecules using a variety of techniques, development of antibodies and immunoassays to small haptens and proteins, high throughput analysis using immunoassay, and validation of immunoassays with mass spectral techniques. It also provides structural characterization of small organic metabolites using mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy and other techniques. It will continue focus on providing mass spectral support for small molecule analysis for metabolomics and for pharmacokinetics.  It provides the facilities for high throughput analysis of biofluids and environmental samples.

The Specific Aims of the Analytical Facility Core are to:

  • Assist other investigators in the development and validation of new analytical methods emphasizing small molecules.
  • Provide class specific and compound specific metabolomic support to integrate with transcriptomic and proteomic databases.  Both global fingerprinting and pathway specific profiling are supported.
  • Provide facilities and technologies high throughput assays for environmental and human monitoring of agricultural chemicals, other xenobiotics, and biomarkers.
  • Provide support for pharmacokinetic studies on small molecule environmental contaminants and chemical probes which alter xenobiotic metabolism.
  • Afford access to the equipment and expertise necessary to conduct studies requiring the isolation, identification and quantitative measurement of small molecules.
  • Provide a broad based analytical laboratory with walk up use of instrumentation to researchers in the center as well as expertise on generation and interpretation of analytical data.
  • Provide hapten synthesis, conjugation, general infrastructure, equipment, and advice on the preparation of antibodies for immunoassay, histochemistry, Western blots and other uses.

ANIMAL MODELS

Leaders: Kent Lloyd and Dallas Hyde.

The aims of the Animal Models Core are to develop state-of-the-art experimental models available to Center members in four areas:

1)    Nonhuman primate models for reproductive and respiratory toxicology: Develop and maintain Web-based capability for sharing existing data and specimens; organize and compile data; coordinate access to new specimens as they are generated; store, catalog and ship specimens.

2)    Inhalation exposure models: Design, develop and validate inhalation exposure conditions for airborne pollutants (including reactive gases, pyrolysis products, bioaerosols, particulates, complex mixtures) and conduct and monitor test exposures for rodents and nonhuman primates, including primary nonhuman primate and human cells in culture.

3)    Transgenic mice for environmental toxicology: Develop, validate and establish transgenic mouse lines that allow testing of specific signaling and cytokine mechanisms.

4)    Cell models for toxicology studies: Develop, characterize and maintain a reservoir of primary nonhuman primate and human cells (i.e., tracheobronchial and alveolar cells), transfected human cell lines and monkey and human stem cells.  This approach will include transfection of stem cells with vectors for overexpression and gene silencing technologies for cells in vitro.  To develop and image injected stem cells (with or without gene transfection) in rodents and nonhuman primates using noninvasive imaging.

GENOMICS/PROTEOMICS

Leaders - Robert Rice and Jeffrey Gregg.

The overall goal of the Genomics and Proteomics Core is to assist in the identification of critical macromolecular differences (mRNA, protein) among cells or tissues from culture models, animal models or human studies that have or have not been exposed to toxic agents. Data collected using transcriptomic and proteomic analyses will be important for hypothesis generation and testing, biomarker development, and the elucidation of toxic mechanisms.  For example, cell culture studies can lead to hypotheses regarding the mechanisms by which specific targets are perturbed (points 10-12 in Figure 1) that can then be tested in animal studies (points 6-8), or findings in animals can be tested in culture.  Evidence for perturbation of macromolecular targets can then be pursued in human studies through utilization of associated biomarkers (point 2).  In the reverse direction, associations between environmental conditions and environmental outcomes may lead to identification of putative macromolecular biomarkers that can be examined in animal and culture models.  Anticipated findings of considerable value for establishing causation and for characterizing the degree of hazard are the dose or concentration dependence of effects and the relative sensitivity among species and model test subjects (organisms, tissues, cells).  This information will then facilitate clinical studies and permit scientifically defensible standards for exposure and for hazardous waste cleanup.  As seen in Figure 1, we envision an integrated approach to human, animal, in vitro and clinical studies.  Data generated through the Genomics/Proteomics Core is anticipated to help evaluate human effects through studies of biomarkers of exposure or effect and permit evaluation of potential sensitive populations, as well as to help in translation of mechanistic results from animal and in vitro to clinical studies.

 

During previous funding periods of the Center, transcriptome analysis was conducted in the Molecular Biology Facility Core, and proteomics was covered on a limited basis in the Analytical Biochemistry Facility Core.  Complementing the approach in the new Genomics and Proteomics Core, metabolomics efforts are being addressed in the new Analytical Facility Core (Core C).  Together, these efforts constitute a systems approach to analyzing effects of toxic agents. Through the Genomics and Proteomics Core, Center members will have opportunities to measure the effects of exposure at the levels of gene transcription and protein expression, a substantial advantage since any single method can analyze only part of the cellular response. In some cases, effects at one level may be dominant in driving the response, while in others more than one level is important in understanding the cell response.  Ultimately, integrating information from the various levels will permit fundamental mechanistic understanding of cellular effects from toxic perturbation. 

 The Specific Aims of the Genomics and Proteomics Core are to:

1.  Provide transcriptional profiling and confirmation through the use of:

A.  Commercial arrays such as Affymetrix chips

            B.  Quantitative real-time PCR

            C.  Transcriptional knockdown using lentivral shRNA vectors

2.  Provide proteomic analysis including:

            A.  Protein identification

            B.  Quantitative protein profiling

      C.  Posttranslational modifications

3.   Provide appropriate in-depth training to graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and technical staff.

4.   Develop new methods in transcriptomic/proteomic analysis to assist Center investigators in addressing research questions in their laboratories.

5.   Assist investigators in obtaining preliminary data and providing methodological support for new grant applications.

 IMAGING

Leaders - Kent Pinkerton and Laura Van Winkle

The overall goal of the Imaging Facility Core (IFC) is to assist in the identification of toxic responses among cells or tissues from animal models, culture models or human studies using histologic approaches and imaging.  The IFC has served the Center since its inception as a resource for scientists, investigators, faculty, fellows and students with a wide variety of backgrounds, some of whom are completely unfamiliar with imaging or sample preparation options. The Imaging Facility Core has continuously offered cutting-edge guidance on experimental design, training, services and equipment use, while providing expertise and analytical capabilities in transmission and scanning electron microscopy, microtomy, sample dissection, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization and tissue fixation/processing.  

The Specific Aims of the Imaging Facility Core are to:

1.  Provide service in microscopy and imaging to all investigators, including:

A.  Tissue sampling and specimen preparation;

B.  Microscopic image acquisition ;

C.  mRNA and protein detection in/from specimens;

D.  Quantitative and qualitative imaging of cells, sectioned tissue and whole mounts;

E.  Analysis of digital 2-D, 3-D, 4-D, and 5-D images;

F.  Live cell imaging;

      G.  Image adjustment, rendering, qualitative analysis and presentation; and

      H.  Image and text database development, data archiving and retrieval.

 

2.  Provide appropriate in-depth training to graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and technical staff, including:

      A.  Tissue preparation and microtomy for light, epifluorescent and electron microscopy;

      B.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy;

      C.  Laser capture imaging and microdissection; 

      D.  Cellular imaging with quantitative ion analysis;          

      E.  Histopathology and Immunocytochemistry (ICC) staining and trouble shooting;

      F.   In situ hybridization (ISH); and          

      G.  Videomicrometry.   

 

3.  Act as a resource and referral service by providing information on the latest imaging approaches        and techniques, including those not available in the Core but present in other facilities at UC Davis.

 

4. Assist in the development of new methodologies in imaging to assist Center investigators in       addressing research questions in their laboratories.

 

5. Assist investigators in obtaining preliminary data and providing methodologic support for new       grant applications.

 

The Facility Core faculty and staff are available for consultations on development of new methodologies or approaches in all aspects of the imaging techniques described above.  IFC staff and faculty provide a technical reference resource, as well a scientific explanation of new technologies not present in this Core but available through other UC Davis facilities.  An example of such consultation is the most efficient methods for tissue preservation and sectioning to collect tissues for microarray analysis.  These methods also extend to the vascular perfusion preparations to insure blood-free organs for tissue proteomics and metabolomic procedures. The Facility Core and staff are also actively involved in teaching courses and workshops at both UC Davis and at conferences/society meetings on topics in microscopy, stereology, fluorescence microscopy and preparation/analysis of three-dimensional tissue samples.  The primary goals of this facility core continue to be: (1) provide service in imaging to scientists, faculty and students affiliated with the Center; (2) act as a resource and referral service by providing information on the latest imaging approaches and techniques; and (3) offer training to graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and junior scientists in the use of imaging equipment.

 

The IFC has a long history of providing access to equipment, training, services and consulting expertise related to the analysis of normal and abnormal morphology at the whole animal, organ, cell, subcellular, and molecular levels, which forms an integrated approach to human, animal, in vitro and clinical studies, as illustrated in Figure 4. An ongoing mission of this Facility Core is to provide the most updated, state-of-the-art techniques and services to all investigators, both in and out of CEHS, interested in using imaging in their research.

Research Cores

Air Pollutant Health Effects

Members: Buckpitt (Leader), Pinkerton (Co-Leader), Eiserich, Giulivi, Hammock, Harper, Hyde, Kenyon, Last, Plopper, Schenker, van Winkle

Overall Goals and Specific Aims. A critical mass of scientists in the CEHS are primarily toxicologists, most of whom have a long standing interest in and track record of accomplishments focused on  the respiratory system.  These CEHS members are part of a larger consortium on campus, the Air Quality Research Center that includes engineers, atmospheric chemists, and analytical chemists with interests in the generation, source apportionment, atmospheric reactions, and adverse health effects of air pollutants.  This multidisciplinary group of scientists provides unique opportunities to address significant and complex problems related to air pollution, some of which also involve the cardiovascular system.  The CEHS, in turn, provides a structure to foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and a number of successful examples of collaboration where this has resulted in new directions and funding.  The overall goal of this Core within the CEHS is to provide a vehicle for continued advancement in the area of air-pollution related health research.  We will reach this goal by facilitating research among Center members and affiliate members to address the human health significance of environmental hazards.  Specific agents include organic chemicals related to combustion processes, oxidants such as O3, particulates, allergens, pesticides, and tobacco smoke. 

Overview and Significance. Agriculture in California’s Central Valley is highly varied.  Rich soil combined with abundant sunlight is ideal for crops as varied as walnuts, almonds, citrus, cotton, rice, and tomatoes.  Pesticides and agricultural dusts, exacerbated by the arid climate, are potentially important toxic byproducts of these agricultural activities.  What is less obvious are sources of environmental pollution from unregulated diesel and gasoline engines that are used to pump water and produce power for plowing and  harvesting operations.  Large commercial dairy, beef, and poultry operations add to the potential mixture of pollutants released into the environment.  In addition, the degradation of the air quality in the Central Valley has been exacerbated by explosive population growth in cities such as Sacramento, Tracy, and Stockton, which are now serving as bedroom communities for commuters to the Bay Area.  Intense sunlight, with temperatures in the summer often exceeding 100°F, combined with emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion resulting from gridlock on freeways in the Central Valley means that the population is exposed to known hazards (oxidants, particles) and to a number of other compounds whose toxicity in animals is well delineated but for which the health effects in humans are largely unknown.  More importantly we understand very little about how the mixture of potential toxicants acts in a synergistic or antagonistic fashion to result in long term deleterious effects on pulmonary, cardiovascular, and renal function.  Prospective studies conducted over the long term in Southern California have shown that certain air pollutants (e.g. NO2, <2.5 µ particles) alter the development of the lung, resulting in decrements in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (Gauderman et al., 2004).  Not clear are whether these decrements eventually resolve, whether they lead to long-term disease processes, what the specific impacts of each of the individual components of polluted air contribute to overall disease, and how these components interact. 

 Neurological Toxicology Research

Members: Cortopassi (Leader), Pessah (Co-Leader), Berman, Hansen, Gorin, Matsumura, Van de Water

Overall Goals and Specific Aims. The seven Center members of this Core represent different aspects of neuroscience as it relates to neurodevelopmental research. This particular combination of talent and research interest provides the basis for intra-core and intra-Center collaborations.  In addition to the three original members (Cortopassi, Pessah, and Matsumura), two basic (Van de water and Berman) and two clinical (Gorin and Hansen) scientists have been added to provide a broad yet focused group of complementary research scientists together.  Dr. Hansen is Professor of Pediatrics with experience in clinical research and treating children with neurodevelopmental problems such as PDD and autism.  Dr. Hansen is Co-Investigator of CHARGE, CHARGE-BACK, and MARBLES studies and head of the CCEHDP's COTC.  Dr. Van de Water is Associate Professor of Clinical Immunology in the School of Medicine and focuses on the contribution of dysregulation of immune functions to neurological disorders associated with autism.  Dr. Berman is an expert on brain development and behavior in animal models, in particular those developed in the mouse.  Both Drs. Van de Water and Berman have worked closely with Dr. Pessah to define immunological anomalies in autistic children and identify their possible mechanisms and the role of environmental exposures. They collaborate extensively on developing gene-environment models of immune dysregulation and abnormal development of behavior and brain anatomy that may be relevant to a broad range of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. Dr. Gorin is a neurologist with a Ph.D. in pharmacology whose recent interest is in mapping flux pathways associated with diseases and in the development of drugs that are capable of selectively reaching the central nervous system via active transporters.  Most recently he has applied this approach to the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to treat gliomas.  As the risk factors in autism and Parkinson’s disease become more apparent, his expertise will be used to explore avenues of intervention.     
 

The overarching goal of this Research Core is to provide leadership in a broadly-based neurodevelopmental research program that will reach investigators at the basic, population, and clinical levels. The specific long-term goal of the Neurological Toxicology Research Core is to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms by which environmental toxicants and complex mixtures cause neural dysfunction.  In addition to the specific aims delineated for all three of the research cores, the Neurological Toxicology Research Core will promote and facilitate interdisciplinary research in neurodevelopmental toxicology and will focus on fostering collaboration to address the human health significance of environmental agents that selectively interfere with the normal patterns of neuronal signaling, growth, and death.   Emphasis will be on the interaction between the nervous and immune systems; chronic, low level exposures; and genetic predisposition to adverse effects.  

 

These investigators will strive to identify the key steps involved in cellular signaling that are influenced by environmental toxicants and pollutants and elucidate how this altered signaling activity may change specific aspects of neuronal health and be used as markers of individual exposure and neural health.

 

2. b.ii. Overview and Significance. This research core fosters multidisciplinary interactions that focus specifically on the molecular and cellular mechanisms that influence the integrity of the central and peripheral nervous systems.  California, and particularly the Central Valley, has attracted national attention because of a steep rise in neurodevelopmental disease among its population.  Concern is increasing that humans and animals are exposed to a wide variety of neurotoxicants and that these environmental toxicants may have untoward health effects. For example, a broad spectrum of pesticides and agricultural-related xenobiotics are used in California, many of which are known neurotoxicants.  Great concern exists about how chronic low-level exposure to environmental neurotoxicants may affect the developing and aging nervous systems by adversely influencing the onset and severity of certain neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism.  Although many of these diseases have known genetic factors that enhance susceptibility, evidence is increasing that environmental factors enhance the risk of these diseases.  As stated earlier, the first large cohort study showed clear and very significant increases in the incidence of Parkinson’s disease in those individuals exposed to pesticides (Ascherio et al., 2006). Furthermore, epidemiological evidence is emerging that certain pervasive environmental contaminants associated with Northern California such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), methylmercury, and rotenone can influence subtle aspects of cognition, intelligence, and behavior.  Exposure to complex environmental mixtures may have synergistic or unexpected effects that may not be predicted from exposure to the individual components.  For example, the subtle effects of low levels of organophosphate, which alter rates of neuronal signaling by their anti-acetylcholinesterase activity, may be synergized by environmental exposure to PCBs that alter the fidelity of intracellular Ca2+ signaling.  Alternatively, chemicals that primarily influence the function of the immune system can indirectly influence the health of the nervous system via inappropriate or abusive secretion of cytokines known to influence the nervous system.  Considering that significant and growing urban and suburban populations within the Central Valley of California are in close proximity to agricultural operations and other sources of pollution, the increased potential for exposure to complex mixtures of neurotoxicants that harm health is of great concern. 

Cell Signaling and Carcinogenesis Research

Members: Matsumura (Leader), Guilivi, Kung (Co-Leader), Denison, Gregg, Rice, Wood and Wu

Overall Goals and Specific Aims. This group of scientists represents an extremely broad aspect of cell biology, providing skills that provide the potential to form collaborations with all other components of the CEHS.  This research core assembles a critical mass of scientists whose interests and past accomplishments align well with studies directed towards chemically induced carcinogenic cell transformations, particularly through epigenetic mechanisms.  Collectively, this group will examine chemically-induced changes in signaling mediated by specific receptors such as AhR, ER, AR, RAR and RXT (Drs. Denison, Rice and Matsumura) as well as those induced and mediated by stress such, as oxidative and inflammatory stress (Drs. Kung, Giulivi, and Wood).  Many of signaling activities are transduced and propagated through specific pathways, which are dominated by specific kinases and phosphatases.  Dr. Kung has been the leader in this field and he has had a long history of collaborating with Dr. Matsumura’s group on this subject. Collaborations through sharing both ideas and technologies will accelerate research to address the basic changes in cellular responses that are relevant to carcinogenic transformation processes, such as loss of apoptotic responses, promotion of cellular migration, macrophage recruiting, and stimulation of angiogenesis, that are often accompanied by changes in the activity of key kinases (tyrosine kinases, PKC, MAPKs) and nuclear transcription factors. The overall goal of the Cell Signaling and Carcinogenesis Research Core is to elucidate the mechanisms through which environmental factors promote carcinogenesis so that our findings can eventually assist prevention and therapeutic approaches to reduce cancer incidence and suffering.  In addition to the specific aims listed for all of the research cores, this core will focus on studying the mechanisms of carcinogenesis that are strongly affected by environmental factors by using cutting-edge technologies. Our emphasis will be on environmental agents that selectively interfere with normal cell signaling, division, and death.     

Overview and Significance. Cancer continues to be a major health problem in the United States.  While significant progress has been made in our understanding of the cellular basis of carcinogenesis, particularly the role of DNA damage and mutation in its initiation, many important questions remain concerning cellular progression to malignant phenotypes and the influence of environmental factors.  In cancers (e.g., of breast and prostate), shown epidemiologically to be greatly affected by the environment, research efforts have increasingly focused on cellular signaling pathways that affect carcinogenic outcomes.  In this direction, major topics of interest include growth factors, tyrosine kinases, hormone receptors and stress signaling (such as oxidative stress). Success in the use of specific signal transduction inhibitors is exemplified by the targeting of tyrosine kinases (e.g., Gleevec) and growth factor receptors (e.g., Herceptin-2).

This Core will focus on mechanistic aspects of environmentally promoted carcinogenesis, particularly breast and prostate cancer.  Our Core activities will encourage interactions within the CEHS. Exciting opportunities for discovery include the role of cell stress (inflammation, apoptosis, oxidative stress); the roles of stem cells as major targets for carcinogenesis; and the significance of cell microenvironments.  The last topic includes recruitment of phagocytotic hematopoietic cells and communication through cytokines, chemokines, and other bioactive agents. To promote communication within the UC Davis community, including our own Center scientists, we will host seminars, workshops and group discussions of exciting new developments in cancer biology and cell signaling.  For example, Dr. Kung organizes a series of periodic “Cross-Talk” discussion sessions for this purpose that bring together scientists with overlapping interests on emerging signaling elements. These sessions will serve to raise awareness of the importance of signaling pathways in environmentally promoted carcinogenesis.

 

Send Webmaster comments to rlmorrison@ucdavis.edu.
URL: http://www.envtox.ucdavis.edu/cehs
 Updated 4/10/07